Opinion: The TV commercial I hate most
- Jim Glynn
- Apr 5
- 1 min read
For many years, I found TV commercials to be so annoying that when Cable TV was first introduced to viewers, I immediately signed up because it promised commercial-free viewing. And, at least for a while, it delivered. But, eventually, commercial-bearing channels were added. The price of subscription increased. As recently as December 2023, my Xfinity package was $181.50; but in Feb., 2024, it was $208; and by the end of the year, $265.20.
A satellite service challenged cable, but it doesn’t have Home Box Office (HBO) among its choices. And, of course, I’m paying for the hundreds of channels that I never watch, many of them in foreign languages. However, I keep holding out hope for a less expensive alternative.
I must also point out that the nature of cable TV has changed, and quite dramatically. Now, movie channels show series. So, if I choose to watch a certain “movie,” I may find that it is actually Season 2, Episode 7 of a continuing saga. Moreover, certain channels serve up a steady diet of The Godfather, Godfather II, and Godfather Coda. Today as I write, “Jack Reacher,” the movie based on Lee Child’s books about a 6’3” former Army MP but played by 5’7” Tom Cruise, can be seen several times during the day on two of the few channels that I watch. Moreover, the “On Demand” system used to have hundreds of free movies. Now, most of them require a rental fee.
Recent Posts
See AllJim Glynn’s April 19 column of California High Speed Rail (HSR) is real telling with an extraordinary amount of information. For myself,...
Placer County District Attorney Morgan Gire told National Public Radio (NPR), “It is somewhat shocking to see how much you can get away...
First, let me say that I think that Paul Levine is one of this country’s fine writers. Second, I’ve enjoyed all of the books in his Jake...
Comments